By Jeffrey S. Reznick and Lenore Barbian
On July 8, 1881, the Grand Jury of the District of Columbia was discharged without the District Attorney presenting Charles Guiteau for indictment. The reason for the delay lies with a letter from the Presidents physicians who stated:
In reply to your inquiry as to condition of the President, we would say that up to the present time he has done exceedingly well for one who has received so dangerous a wound; but while we anticipate recovery, it is not yet possible to assert with confidence that his injuries may not terminate fatally.
—Hayes, Henry Gillespie, and Charles Joseph Hayes. 1882. A complete history of the life and trial of Charles Julius Guiteau, assassin of President Garfield.
It would be on October 8, 1881—following Garfield’s death—that the District Attorney would present an eleven count indictment against Guiteau for the assassination of the President. Perhaps at this point, it would be instructive to investigate who this would be assassin was.
Charles Julius Guiteau was born on September 8, 1841 in Freeport, Illinois, the fourth of six children of Luther and Jane Guiteau. By age seven, Charles would lose his mother and be left to be raised by his disciplinarian and devotedly religious father. During Guiteau’s early childhood, his sister Frances actually assumed most of the responsibility for raising the young boy, and she would remain his lifelong supporter even after an apparent murder attempt by Charles.
Although Charles’ early education may have been haphazard, by his teenage years he was dedicated to improving himself “physically, intellectually, and morally” (Rosenberg 1968, 16). Charles’ dream of attending college seemed to become a reality when he inherited $1,000 from his maternal grandfather. With this legacy, Guiteau set off to the University of Michigan in the hopes of completing several years of study in preparation for becoming a lawyer. Guiteau’s time in Ann Arbor was not a happy or successful one and would end in failure and financial ruin—a pattern that would become familiar. Throughout the rest of his life, Guiteau would variously pursue four passions—theology, publishing, the law, and politics—without ever achieving success or financial stability in any of them.
Charles Guiteau had the reputation of never paying a bill, even if he had the money. Most of his life was spent escaping landlords and other creditors, and he cheated everyone he dealt with. He constantly borrowed money which he never returned; he attempted to sue anyone he felt crossed him; and he fled town every time his debts mounted. He joined the Oneida Community in 1860 but was not popular with either the young people or the commune elders. He left the Oneida in 1865 to attempt his first business venture with money provided by the Oneida. Guiteau dreamed of founding a chain of daily theological newspapers. In a matter of months, Guiteau was destitute. In 1868, after a few months as a law clerk, he became a “lawyer” with a practice consisting of collecting debts on commission—but his habit of pocketing the money he collected was exposed by a newspaper. Having failed in this field of operations, he then decided to become an evangelist. He “wrote,” published, and sold a religious booklet “The Truth,” which he had stolen, almost word-for-word, from another author. Expulsion from a New York church did not stop him from calling himself “Reverend” and lecturing in various cities on such topics as “Is There a Hell?”
In 1880, an election year, Guiteau switched from evangelism to politics. He wrote campaign speeches for the Republicans, but they declined his services as an orator. Despite any official party role, Guiteau nonetheless celebrated the election victory of his party’s candidate, James Garfield. Following the election, Guiteau decided it would be nice to be an ambassador. Feeling that the Republican party owed him due to his “service” during the presidential campaign, Guiteau went to Washington to petition for the job. He spent his days at the White House and the Capitol, but Mr. Garfield and other officials ignored him. After months of persistent petitioning, Guiteau conceived the idea of killing President Garfield. On June 8, 1881 Guiteau bought a gun with borrowed money. He practiced shooting at trees by the river and awaited his opportunity.
On June 16, in his rented room in a Washington boarding house, Guiteau wrote an “Address to the American People.” In it he explained the reasons for his actions:
Ingratitude is the basest of crimes. That the President, under the manipulation of his Secretary of State, has been guilty of the basest ingratitude to the Stalwarts admits of no denial…. I had no ill-will to the President. This is not murder. It is a political necessity. It will make my friend Arthur President, and save the Republic. I have sacrificed only one. I shot the President as I would a rebel, if I saw him pulling down the American flag. I leave my justification to God and the American people.
—Rosenberg, Charles E. 1968. The trial of the assassin Guiteau; psychiatry and law in the Gilded Age.
Guiteau stalked the President, learning his daily routine and even following Garfield into church. Guiteau would let several chances pass, once because Garfield was accompanying his wife who was ill. The frail appearance of Mrs. Garfield so affected Guiteau that he simply could not kill the President with Mrs. Garfield clinging to his arm. But by July 2nd Guiteau was determined. He ate breakfast, had his shoes shined, left a packet of papers addressed to a New York Herald reporter, and waited for Garfield to arrive at the train station.
This post is one of a series reenacting the official bulletins released to the public by the physicians to President Garfield during his illness after the shooting on July 2, 1881.
Jeffrey S. Reznick, PhD, is Chief of NLM’s History of Medicine Division and author of two books and numerous articles on the cultural history of war and medicine. Lenore Barbian, PhD, is Associate Professor and Anthropology Program Director at Edinboro University of Pennsylvania. She is author of numerous articles, including “Remains of War: Walt Whitman, Civil War Soldiers, and the Legacy of Medical Collections“, co-authored with Jeff Reznick and Paul Sledzik, which received the 2013 best article award from the Archivists and Librarians in the History of the Health Sciences (ALHHS).